The Diplomat in Spain
  • Frontpage
  • News
    • Spain
    • World
    • The world in Spain
    • Diplomatic Breakfast
    • Diplomacy with a history
    • The bag
    • Social life
    • Appointments
  • Tribune
  • VIP Club
  • Embassies
    • Embassies Directory
    • Protocol
    • International legislation
  • Discover Spain
  • UNWTO News
  • Leisure
    • Culture & Art
    • Entertainment
    • Movies
  • es Español
  • en English
  • Account
No Result
View All Result
  • Frontpage
  • News
    • Spain
    • World
    • The world in Spain
    • Diplomatic Breakfast
    • Diplomacy with a history
    • The bag
    • Social life
    • Appointments
  • Tribune
  • VIP Club
  • Embassies
    • Embassies Directory
    • Protocol
    • International legislation
  • Discover Spain
  • UNWTO News
  • Leisure
    • Culture & Art
    • Entertainment
    • Movies
No Result
View All Result
The Diplomat in Spain
No Result
View All Result

Amy Coney Barrett and the United States Supreme Court

October 16, 2020
in Uncategorized

Jorge Pérez Alonso

Lawyer and researcher at the Martínez Marina Seminar on Constitutional History

 

The death of Ruth Bader Gisburn on 27 September and President Trump’s decision to propose Amy Coney Barrett as her replacement have led to a flood of headlines in which the judge’s curriculum vitae has been completely edged out to label her simply “ultraconservative” or “Catholic”. Even her relative youth (forty-eight years) has been questioned in order to reach the top of the American judiciary, despite the fact that Joseph Story, one of the most brilliant judges who served on the Supreme Court, reached it in 1812 at the age of thirty-one, or that William Rehnquist (the former chief justice) did so in 1972 at the age of forty-seven, one less than Barrett.

 

What many fear is at stake is nothing less than the internal balance of the Supreme Court, which had been in place since the late 1970s and could, for the first time in half a century, be oriented in a conservative direction. But what is really at stake is a whole legal conception of how to interpret the constitutional text and the position of the judge.

 

Since the period of reconstruction, there have been two conceptions of the role of the judiciary. There are those who, in favour of judicial activism, defend that the judge must use all the instruments that the Constitution grants him/her when defending citizens’ rights, and that they should not hesitate to make use of the main tool they possess, the judicial review (the capacity for judicial review). Opposing them are those who maintain that many of the judicial conflicts cover up issues of a political nature that must be resolved through such channels. Justice Stephen Field, during his thirty-four and a half years on the Supreme Court (1863-1897), would embody judicial activism, while in contrast, his legal nemesis, Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.

 

There is another aspect of no lesser importance, which is the interpretation to be made of the Constitution. There are those who defend that the constitutional text is a living document (living constitution), which must be interpreted in accordance with the social reality of each moment, so that realities that it does not specifically contemplate can be protected. Based on this criterion, a true legal revolution took place in the third quarter of the 20th century, especially when the Supreme Court was presided over by Earl Warren, when rights not formally provided for in the constitutional text were extracted from the text, as in the cases Mapp v. Ohio or the famous Miranda v. Arizona. Even in 1973, during Warren Burger’s time, the Supreme Court expanded the catalogue of rights by including the right to terminate a pregnancy among those protected by the Constitution in Roe v. Wade, a decision that has been on the backburner ever since.

 

In contrast, there are those who advocate a stricter interpretation of the Constitution, linking it to the intent of its drafters. Amy Coney Barrett herself, in an article published in 2017 with the title Originalism and stare decisis, explains it in a very didactic way: “The originalists maintain that the decisions of previous generations, contained in the ratified text, are binding until the text is reformed. The contours of these decisions are mainly drawn from historical sources. For example, the original meaning of the Constitution can be obtained from sources such as the Constitutional Convention, the ratification debates, the federalist and anti-federalist writings, the actions of the first Congresses and Presidents, and the first rulings of the federal courts”. Therefore, the constitutional text is not something living, but petrified or linked to the intention of the constituents, which must prevail as long as it is not subject to constitutional mutation through the established channels.

 

© FAES / You can go on reading this article at Fundación FAES website (in Spanish)

 

 

ShareTweetSend
Previous Post

Spain and Costa Rica agree to institutionalise their bilateral dialogue

Next Post

The Teatro Fernán Gómez presents 'Ana', a woman in the 60s

The bag

Walter Gutiérrez, former Ombudsman, new Peru’s ambassador to Spain

Peru's president, Dina Boluarte, has appointed the lawyer Walter Gutiérrez, who was Ombudsman between 2016 and 2021, as Peru's new ambassador to Spain,

More bags>

Hemeroteca

Receive our newsletter

We use MailChimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to MailChimp for processing. Learn more about MailChimp's privacy practices here.

  • Contacto
  • ¿Quiénes somos?
  • Aviso legal y Propiedad intelectual

© The Diplomat in Spain. All rights reserved.

  • English
  • Español (Spanish)
Account
  • Frontpage
  • News
    • Spain
    • World
    • The world in Spain
    • Diplomatic Breakfast
    • Diplomacy with a history
    • The bag
    • Social life
    • Appointments
  • Tribune
  • VIP Club
  • Embassies
    • Embassies Directory
    • Protocol
    • International legislation
  • Discover Spain
  • UNWTO News
  • Leisure
    • Culture & Art
    • Entertainment
    • Movies

© The Diplomat in Spain. All rights reserved.

Tanto nuestros partners como nosotros utilizamos cookies en nuestro sitio web para personalizar contenido y publicidad o analizar nuestro tráfico. Haciendo click consientes el uso de esta tecnología en nuestra web. Saber más